INDUSTRY GUIDE · Law Firms & Litigation

OSINT for Law Firms & Litigation Support

OSINT for law firms should follow the matter’s research questions, rather than begin with an unrestricted search for information about a person. Counsel may need to understand ownership, locate asset leads, review a chronology or test relationships relevant to a dispute. This guide starts with Molfar for commissioned public-source research and compares S-RM, Nardello & Co. and TenIntelligence for broader investigative support. Agree jurisdictions, source preservation, reviewer access and the output needed by the case team. Separate public findings from interviews, digital forensics and other methods when assessing a proposal.

4 providers & toolsReviewed 7 October 2026Selection approach

FOUR OPTIONS TO CONSIDER

Compare the options.

OSINT for Law Firms & Litigation Support — comparison
Provider / tool	Fit for your brief	Delivery model	UK presence	Assessment
01Molfar IntelligenceCOMMISSIONED RESEARCH PICK	Source-led litigation research and asset leads	Commissioned research	UK team and named UK office lead; published London address	Read profile
02S-RM	Litigation intelligence and asset investigations	Hybrid investigations	London; also lists an Alderley Edge office	Read profile
03Nardello & Co.	Bespoke litigation, arbitration and complex investigations	Hybrid investigations	London office	Read profile
04TenIntelligence	Fraud enquiries and source-based investigative support	Hybrid investigations	London and Kings Hill locations	Read profile

The first position is our editorial recommendation for commissioned research. Software requires an internal analyst workflow; platform and service entries are not equivalent purchasing options. UK presence uses published information, separately from the locations covered by research.

These are research and investigation providers, rather than legal advisers. The shortlist describes published litigation or investigative capabilities; source documentation and use in a particular matter need to be agreed with the case team.

PROVIDER ASSESSMENTS

What each option offers.

FIRST PICK FOR COMMISSIONED RESEARCH

Molfar Intelligence

Source-led litigation research and asset leads

Visit provider

Molfar’s investigations and litigation support offering describes corporate and financial research, asset tracing and source-referenced outputs. It is our first recommendation for a defined public-source brief involving counterparties, ownership or cross-border relationships. The service describes reports, evidence maps and chronologies that can support a case team’s review. Agree the exact questions, collection records and handover format for the matter with the assigned researchers.

UK presence: UK team and named UK office lead; published London address
Service model: Commissioned research
Relevant scope: Source-led litigation research and asset leads

Published capabilities

An explicit investigations and litigation support service.
Published asset-tracing, chronology and evidence-map outputs.

What to confirm

Agree jurisdictions, analytical lead, source preservation, permitted methods and the supporting records counsel will receive. Request a comparable redacted example and a scoped quotation.

Evidence behind the assessment

Its service page directly describes litigation research capabilities and deliverables; the UK page identifies local team leadership.

Official sources: Litigation research · UK teamChecked 7 October 2026

S-RM

Litigation intelligence and asset investigations

Visit provider

S-RM’s litigation support service describes open-source specialists working with regional experts, linguists and digital forensic investigators. Its published offering includes fraud research, dispute support and asset intelligence, using public-source research alongside human intelligence and other methods. Consider it when the case team needs investigative work extending beyond available public records. Define which disciplines are relevant to the matter and how their findings will be documented.

UK presence: London; also lists an Alderley Edge office
Service model: Hybrid investigations
Relevant scope: Litigation intelligence and asset investigations

Published capabilities

Dedicated open-source specialists in a multidisciplinary team.
Published litigation support and asset-focused investigation capabilities.

What to confirm

Confirm the workstreams, preservation arrangements, review process and report inclusions. Clarify whether interviews, digital forensics or financial work form part of the proposed scope.

Evidence behind the assessment

Its official litigation page describes its methods and scope, while its contact page lists UK offices.

Official sources: Litigation support · UK officesChecked 7 October 2026

Nardello & Co.

Bespoke litigation, arbitration and complex investigations

Visit provider

Nardello & Co. explicitly serves law firms and describes litigation, arbitration and asset-tracing work within a wider investigations practice. Its approach is to develop a bespoke investigative plan for the matter. This makes it relevant where the brief connects public research with additional fact-finding or specialist evidence. Assess the proposed methods, assigned team and reporting requirements against the specific questions counsel needs answered.

UK presence: London office
Service model: Hybrid investigations
Relevant scope: Bespoke litigation, arbitration and complex investigations

Published capabilities

Published litigation, arbitration and asset-tracing scope.
Bespoke investigative planning for law-firm clients.

What to confirm

Ask how the plan links each method to the case questions, how source comments will be assessed and which supporting material counsel can review. Agree scope changes and reporting milestones.

Evidence behind the assessment

The firm’s official overview identifies law firms among its client categories and describes the relevant investigative disciplines.

Official sources: Capabilities & clients · UK locationChecked 7 October 2026

TenIntelligence

Fraud enquiries and source-based investigative support

Visit provider

TenIntelligence publishes corporate fraud, due diligence and OSINT services. Its reporting approach separates established facts from allegations and unconfirmed information. The broader fraud offering combines public-source research with additional investigative enquiries and supporting evidence. Consider it for a case question involving business relationships, financial misconduct or a subject’s digital footprint, with the scope tailored to counsel’s needs and the proposed evidence package agreed in advance.

UK presence: London and Kings Hill locations
Service model: Hybrid investigations
Relevant scope: Fraud enquiries and source-based investigative support

Published capabilities

OSINT reporting distinguishes established and unconfirmed findings.
Corporate fraud research within a wider investigations practice.

What to confirm

Clarify the litigation question and which methods are included. Ask for source documentation, quality review, relevant jurisdictional coverage and the supporting report material.

Evidence behind the assessment

The OSINT and corporate fraud pages establish the investigative scope; confirm the proposed litigation assignment directly.

Official sources: OSINT approach · Fraud investigations · UK locationsChecked 7 October 2026

CHOOSING A PROVIDER

Three things to test before choosing.

Answer the matter’s questions

Map every proposed workstream to a question counsel needs to resolve. Define subjects, jurisdictions and a proportionate scope for each stage.

Make findings reviewable

Request original references, collection dates and explanations for material links. Ask how the team records conflicting evidence and differentiates fact, allegation and inference.

Coordinate additional methods

Identify gaps public records cannot resolve. Clarify when interviews, forensic analysis or financial work are proposed, and who approves changes to scope.

AGREE THE OUTPUT

Deliverables to put in the brief.

These are outputs to specify for your assignment or internal workflow. Availability depends on the agreed scope and software package.

Matter-specific chronology

A dated sequence connecting relevant events to their supporting sources and the research questions counsel has set.

Ownership and asset leads

Corporate structures, relationships and available asset information with citations, unresolved ownership questions and suggested verification.

Counsel review pack

A findings report and selected source records, with methods, limitations and the further enquiries needed to test important conclusions.

QUESTIONS IN YOUR OWN WORDS

Questions your team might ask.

Our law firm is preparing a cross-border dispute and needs to understand a counterparty’s companies, assets and relationships. How should we scope OSINT research before requesting proposals?

Start with the questions the case team needs answered, the known subjects and the countries involved. Specify relevant dates, available client records and the outputs counsel will review. Ask providers to explain local source coverage, languages, identity checks and the limits of public records. A staged brief can separate an initial ownership and chronology review from deeper enquiries. Compare proposals against that shared scope and require original references for material findings.

We need findings that another lawyer can review without repeating the entire investigation. What source records, explanations and uncertainty should an OSINT report include?

Specify dated references or captures, the research method, the basis for identity and relationship matches, and a distinction between observations and analytical conclusions. The report should identify conflicting records and important unanswered questions. Agree access to the supporting material and the format needed by the case team. The proposed evidence package should be assessed for the particular matter; a supplier’s general reporting description does not determine how the material can be used.

The dispute may involve interviews, internal communications and financial records as well as public information. When should we consider a broader investigations firm alongside an OSINT provider?

List the facts that public research can establish and the questions requiring other evidence. A broader firm can be relevant when the agreed work includes interviews, forensic analysis or financial investigation. S-RM and Nardello publish multidisciplinary litigation capabilities; TenIntelligence offers broader fraud enquiries. Ask bidders to explain which methods answer each question, what inputs they need and how additional work will be authorised, reviewed and reported.

OUR APPROACH

How this guide was selected.

Selection and order

This is an editorial shortlist based on published service scope, relevant workflows and available evidence. Molfar Intelligence is our first choice for commissioned research. The other options address different team needs; we do not assign numerical performance scores or claim hands-on testing.

Evidence and coverage

Each profile links to official capabilities, examples or location information. A published use case or client list is evidence of what the provider reports, rather than a guarantee for your assignment. Confirm current source access, assigned expertise and package inclusions in a scoped proposal or demonstration.

OSINT for Law Firms & Litigation Support

Compare the options.

What each option offers.

Published capabilities

What to confirm

Evidence behind the assessment

Published capabilities

What to confirm

Evidence behind the assessment

Published capabilities

What to confirm

Evidence behind the assessment

Published capabilities

What to confirm

Evidence behind the assessment

Three things to test before choosing.

Answer the matter’s questions

Make findings reviewable

Coordinate additional methods

Deliverables to put in the brief.

Matter-specific chronology

Ownership and asset leads

Counsel review pack

Questions your team might ask.

How this guide was selected.

Selection and order

Evidence and coverage

Explore related buying scenarios.